Which action constitutes a denial of relief in the case of a missed hearing?

In the context of administrative and legal proceedings, a denial of relief generally refers to a situation where a party is not able to secure the desired outcome due to procedural missteps or failures. When a demanded hearing does not occur, it signifies that the party seeking relief was denied the opportunity to present their case effectively.

In this specific case, if the hearing that was requested or demanded by a party fails to take place, it directly impacts that party's ability to have their claims heard and judged, effectively denying them the chance to receive the relief they are seeking. The absence of the hearing creates a situation where the matters in question remain unresolved, and the issues cannot be properly addressed. Thus, the failure to hold the demanded hearing constitutes a clear denial of relief, as it deprives the party of their right to a fair hearing.

The other options, while relevant to the overall hearing process, do not directly indicate a denial of relief as clearly as the failure to hold the demanded hearing. For instance, failing to submit timely documents or serve notice to involved parties can potentially impact the proceeding but do not inherently stop the hearing from occurring. Similarly, the failure to address all matters in the hearing indicates procedural oversight during the event, rather than the outright denial of